E-mails and comments welcome from teachers and learners of all ages.  
June 18, 2003
Encouragement

Today's Independent:

More than half of all independent schools still do not allow state school pupils to share their facilities, despite the Government's efforts to encourage more partnership between the two sectors.

Encourage. Partnership.

And almost one in 10 of the private schools which have collaborated with the state sector admitted charging more than the going rate for facilities to make a profit from state schools, a survey of 900 fee-paying schools found.

Collaborated.

If you want to buy something from me which I don't want to sell to you, I too will charge more than the "going rate". I usually have my price, but if I really like my something, my price will be high. But, it is mine. I can charge whatever I like. You have the freedom to say no. What would we say of someone who insisted on "buying" something from you, but insisted also on only paying the "going rate"? In other circumstances this is called "compulsory purchase", and the words "compulsory" and "purchase" are often followed by the word "order".

Almost 70 per cent of fee-paying schools reported that they had not opened their specialist teaching facilities such as classrooms, science laboratories, or drama studios to local state schools, according to the study by the Independent Schools Council (ISC).

Could it be that they don't actually want to open their specialist teaching facilities? Makes sense to me. They sound expensive, and complicated to mend if they get broken.

The ISC released the study as part of the sector's campaign to be allowed to keep its charitable status.

Charitable status. Nothing like tax breaks to keep people in line. Command and control lives

Posted by Brian Micklethwait at 09:52 PM
Category: Sovietisation
[0]
Comments

Interesting that it doesn't work the other way round. But that, of course, is because the state sector doesn't have anything the private sector could possibly want.

Comment by: Patrick Crozier on June 20, 2003 06:07 PM


Patrick Crozier is exactly right (although I suspect swinging sarcasm). The state sector DOES NOT have anything the private sector could possibly want. WHY SHOULD the independent sector, which is funded by parents who pay twice (through taxation for the state sector which they do not use, and through school fees) to educate their children be obliged to Provide it's facilities to the state sector?

Comment by: Simon on March 10, 2004 11:39 PM
Post a comment





    







    •