A libertarian inclined blog for teachers and learners of all ages. Comments, emails and links to other educational stuff welcome.
Recent Comments
-
Headteacher job london on Teacher as hero
-
Tony on Exam results in South Africa are bad but the exams themselves may actually be quite good
-
suresh on Police academy
-
MBA Lady on How to learn how easy a language will be to learn
-
Jack Courtney on "There aren't very many jobs for teenagers ..."
-
MBA Lady on "There aren't very many jobs for teenagers ..."
-
Kim Ramsey on Higher paid teachers – bigger classes – better results
-
Procerin Reviews on Higher paid teachers – bigger classes – better results
-
Mia on How Chinese soldiers are trained to keep their heads up
-
Logic Prevails on How Chinese soldiers are trained to keep their heads up
Monthly Archives
-
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
Most recent entries
- Category error!
- The SATs fiasco makes the cover of Private Eye
- Summer holiday
- Grilled Balls
- Party talk
- Lowest bidder
- Another teaching blog
- Unstructured
- “Parents should not rely on SATs …”
- Let the feral kids get jobs
- Rock and roll cricketers?
- The many degrees of Robert Mugabe
- Making the students love ID cards
- The genetics of autism
- Meeting a celeb at a posh school doesn’t count
Blogroll
A don's life
children are people
Dare to Know
Educating Outside The Box
Elemental Mom
Ewan McIntosh's edu.blogs.com
Green House by the Sea
HE&OS
It Shouldn't Happen to a Teacher
Joanne Jacobs
kitchen table math, the sequel
Life WIthout School
Mr. Chalk
Mortarboard
O'DonnellWeb
school of everything
Stay at home dad
Successful Teaching
The ARCH Blog
The Core Knowledge Blog
The DeHavilland Blog
To Miss with Love
Websites
-
A-Z Home's Cool
dyslexics.org.uk
Education Otherwise
Educational Heretics Press
E.G. West Centre
European-American University
Homeschool World
Independent Schools Council
Indian Moms
Kumon
New Model School Company
Reading Reform Foundation
Ruth Miskin Literacy
South West Surrey Home Education
TES
The Supplementary Schools Project
Mainstream Media education sections
BBC
Guardian
Independent
Telegraph
Times
Syndicate
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
Atom
Feedburner
Categories
Adult education
Africa
Architecture
Asia
Australasia
Bias
Bits from books
Bloggers and blogging
Books
Boys
Brian teaches
Bullying
Business education
Canada
China
Class size
Comprehensive schools
Compulsion
Computers
Consent
Crime
dcsf
Diet
Discipline
Distance learning
Drama
Economics
Educational memories
Equality
Europe
Examinations
Exclusion
Famous educations
Gerald Hartup
Girls
Globalisation
Grammar
Grammar schools
Higher education
History
Home education
How the mind works
India
Initiatives
Intelligence
Languages
League tables
Learning by doing
Links
Literacy
Maths
Medicine
Middle East
Movies
Music
OFSTED
Parents
Physical education
Play
Podcasts
Politics
Primary schools
Qualifications
Quote unquote
Reading
Real life
Religion
Russia
Safety
School choice
Science
Scotland
Self education
Sex education
Socialising
South America
Sovietisation
Spelling
Sport
Targets
Teacher training
Technology
Television
Testing
The internet
The private sector
This blog
Three Rs
Training
Truancy
UK
USA
Video
Violence
Vouchers
West Indies
Other Blogs I write for
CNE Competition
CNE Intellectual Property
Samizdata
Transport Blog
Brian Micklethwait
(the personal blog)
Previous entry: Finding out what you truly like
Pupils are being rewarded for writing obscenities in their GCSE English examinations even when it has nothing to do with the question.
One pupil who wrote “f*** off” was given marks for accurate spelling and conveying a meaning successfully.
Key question: how much have they been rewarded. Well, I would say that 11 percent just for “Fuck off!”, with 3.5 percent extra for the exclamation mark is somewhat excessive. On the other hand, “off” is a word that frequently gets spelled wrongly, as “of”. But, on the whole, I don’t favour swearing.
Other examining bodies said that their marking schemes would not reward such language. Edexel said: “If the question was ‘Use a piece of Anglo-Saxon English’, they may get a mark, but if they had just written ‘f*** off’, they may get sanctioned. If it was graphic or violent they may get no mark for that paper.”
Opposition spokesman Nick Gibb said:
“This is fucking ridiculous.”
No. What he really said was:
“It’s taking the desire for uniformity and consistency to absurd lengths.”
Says Coffee House: You couldn’t make it up, and in order to demonstrate that things ain’t what, correction: are not as, they used to be, also links to this. Charles Pooter gets all post-modern about it.