A libertarian inclined blog for teachers and learners of all ages. Comments, emails and links to other educational stuff welcome.
Recent Comments
-
Headteacher job london on Teacher as hero
-
Tony on Exam results in South Africa are bad but the exams themselves may actually be quite good
-
suresh on Police academy
-
MBA Lady on How to learn how easy a language will be to learn
-
Jack Courtney on "There aren't very many jobs for teenagers ..."
-
MBA Lady on "There aren't very many jobs for teenagers ..."
-
Kim Ramsey on Higher paid teachers – bigger classes – better results
-
Procerin Reviews on Higher paid teachers – bigger classes – better results
-
Mia on How Chinese soldiers are trained to keep their heads up
-
Logic Prevails on How Chinese soldiers are trained to keep their heads up
Monthly Archives
-
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
Most recent entries
- Category error!
- The SATs fiasco makes the cover of Private Eye
- Summer holiday
- Grilled Balls
- Party talk
- Lowest bidder
- Another teaching blog
- Unstructured
- “Parents should not rely on SATs …”
- Let the feral kids get jobs
- Rock and roll cricketers?
- The many degrees of Robert Mugabe
- Making the students love ID cards
- The genetics of autism
- Meeting a celeb at a posh school doesn’t count
Blogroll
A don's life
children are people
Dare to Know
Educating Outside The Box
Elemental Mom
Ewan McIntosh's edu.blogs.com
Green House by the Sea
HE&OS
It Shouldn't Happen to a Teacher
Joanne Jacobs
kitchen table math, the sequel
Life WIthout School
Mr. Chalk
Mortarboard
O'DonnellWeb
school of everything
Stay at home dad
Successful Teaching
The ARCH Blog
The Core Knowledge Blog
The DeHavilland Blog
To Miss with Love
Websites
-
A-Z Home's Cool
dyslexics.org.uk
Education Otherwise
Educational Heretics Press
E.G. West Centre
European-American University
Homeschool World
Independent Schools Council
Indian Moms
Kumon
New Model School Company
Reading Reform Foundation
Ruth Miskin Literacy
South West Surrey Home Education
TES
The Supplementary Schools Project
Mainstream Media education sections
BBC
Guardian
Independent
Telegraph
Times
Syndicate
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
Atom
Feedburner
Categories
Adult education
Africa
Architecture
Asia
Australasia
Bias
Bits from books
Bloggers and blogging
Books
Boys
Brian teaches
Bullying
Business education
Canada
China
Class size
Comprehensive schools
Compulsion
Computers
Consent
Crime
dcsf
Diet
Discipline
Distance learning
Drama
Economics
Educational memories
Equality
Europe
Examinations
Exclusion
Famous educations
Gerald Hartup
Girls
Globalisation
Grammar
Grammar schools
Higher education
History
Home education
How the mind works
India
Initiatives
Intelligence
Languages
League tables
Learning by doing
Links
Literacy
Maths
Medicine
Middle East
Movies
Music
OFSTED
Parents
Physical education
Play
Podcasts
Politics
Primary schools
Qualifications
Quote unquote
Reading
Real life
Religion
Russia
Safety
School choice
Science
Scotland
Self education
Sex education
Socialising
South America
Sovietisation
Spelling
Sport
Targets
Teacher training
Technology
Television
Testing
The internet
The private sector
This blog
Three Rs
Training
Truancy
UK
USA
Video
Violence
Vouchers
West Indies
Other Blogs I write for
CNE Competition
CNE Intellectual Property
Samizdata
Transport Blog
Brian Micklethwait
(the personal blog)
Previous entry: I realise that the sidebar is still a mess
Several newspapers have picked up on this apparently very bad news for stay-at-home dads:
Boys brought up by their fathers during their early years are less well prepared for school, claims a Bristol University study.
The controversial finding comes as more men are taking on childcare responsibilities and schools, politicians and newspaper pundits are united in urging fathers to get more involved in their children’s upbringing.
After looking at the early childcare experiences of over 6,000 children born in the Bristol area in the early 1990s who lived at least their early lives in a household with both parents, Elizabeth Washbrook concludes that some fathers appear not to provide the same quality of intellectual stimulation to their young sons as the children’s mothers do.
“Some” fathers. Well, surprise surprise. So that bit at the start should really read: “Some boys brought up by their fathers ...”.
The point of the research is not that stay-at-home dads are doomed to failure whatever they do. No, what they say is that stay-at-home dads tend not to do enough. So the moral is not: go back to work you sandal-wearing twat. The moral is: do a bit more and all will be well.
It’s always interesting to ask of any bit of research into human behaviour: if everyone knew this, would it remain true? In this case, maybe not. Or, not so much.