Brian Micklethwait's Blog

In which I continue to seek part time employment as the ruler of the world.

Home

www.google.co.uk


Recent Comments


Monthly Archives


Most recent entries


Search


Advanced Search


Other Blogs I write for

Brian Micklethwait's Education Blog

CNE Competition
CNE Intellectual Property
Samizdata
Transport Blog


Blogroll

2 Blowhards
6000 Miles from Civilisation
A Decent Muesli
Adloyada
Adventures in Capitalism
Alan Little
Albion's Seedling
Alex Ross: The Rest Is Noise
Alex Singleton
AngloAustria
Another Food Blog
Antoine Clarke
Antoine Clarke's Election Watch
Armed and Dangerous
Art Of The State Blog
Biased BBC
Bishop Hill
BLDG BLOG
Bloggers Blog
Blognor Regis
Blowing Smoke
Boatang & Demetriou
Boing Boing
Boris Johnson
Brazen Careerist
Bryan Appleyard
Burning Our Money
Cafe Hayek
Cato@Liberty
Charlie's Diary
Chase me ladies, I'm in the cavalry
Chicago Boyz
China Law Blog
Cicero's Songs
City Comforts
Civilian Gun Self-Defense Blog
Clay Shirky
Climate Resistance
Climate Skeptic
Coffee & Complexity
Coffee House
Communities Dominate Brands
Confused of Calcutta
Conservative Party Reptile
Contra Niche
Contrary Brin
Counting Cats in Zanzibar
Скрипучая беседка
CrozierVision
Dave Barry
Davids Medienkritik
David Thompson
Deleted by tomorrow
deputydog
diamond geezer
Dilbert.Blog
Dizzy Thinks
Dodgeblogium
Don't Hold Your Breath
Douglas Carswell Blog
dropsafe
Dr Robert Lefever
Dr. Weevil
ecomyths
engadget
Englands Freedome, Souldiers Rights
English Cut
English Russia
EU Referendum
Ezra Levant
Everything I Say is Right
Fat Man on a Keyboard
Ferraris for all
Flickr blog
Freeborn John
Freedom and Whisky
From The Barrel of a Gun
ft.com/maverecon
Fugitive Ink
Future Perfect
FuturePundit
Gaping Void
Garnerblog
Gates of Vienna
Gizmodo
Global Warming Politics
Greg Mankiw's Blog
Guido Fawkes' blog
HE&OS
Here Comes Everybody
Hit & Run
House of Dumb
Iain Dale's Diary
Ideas
Idiot Toys
IMAO
Indexed
India Uncut
Instapundit
Intermezzo
Jackie Danicki
James Delingpole
James Fallows
Jeffrey Archer's Official Blog
Jessica Duchen's classical music blog
Jihad Watch
Joanne Jacobs
Johan Norberg
John Redwood
Jonathan's Photoblog
Kristine Lowe
Laissez Faire Books
Languagehat
Last of the Few
Lessig Blog
Libertarian Alliance: Blog
Liberty Alone
Liberty Dad - a World Without Dictators
Lib on the United Kingdom
Little Man, What Now?
listen missy
Loic Le Meur Blog
L'Ombre de l'Olivier
London Daily Photo
Londonist
Mad Housewife
Mangan's Miscellany
Marginal Revolution
Mark Wadsworth
Media Influencer
Melanie Phillips
Metamagician and the Hellfire Club
Michael Jennings
Michael J. Totten's Middle East Journal
Mick Hartley
More Than Mind Games
mr eugenides
Mutualist Blog: Free Market Anti-Capitalism
My Boyfriend Is A Twat
My Other Stuff
Natalie Solent
Nation of Shopkeepers
Neatorama
neo-neocon
Never Trust a Hippy
NO2ID NewsBlog
Non Diet Weight Loss
Normblog
Nurses for Reform blog
Obnoxio The Clown
Oddity Central
Oliver Kamm
On an Overgrown Path
One Man & His Blog
Owlthoughts of a peripatetic pedant
Oxford Libertarian Society /blog
Patri's Peripatetic Peregrinations
phosita
Picking Losers
Pigeon Blog
Police Inspector Blog
PooterGeek
Power Line
Private Sector Development blog
Public Interest.co.uk
Publius Pundit
Quotulatiousness
Rachel Lucas
RealClimate
Remember I'm the Bloody Architect
Rob's Blog
Sandow
Scrappleface
Setting The World To Rights
Shane Greer
Shanghaiist
SimonHewittJones.com The Violin Blog
Sinclair's Musings
Slipped Disc
Sky Watching My World
Social Affairs Unit
Squander Two Blog
Stephen Fry
Stuff White People Like
Stumbling and Mumbling
Style Bubble
Sunset Gun
Survival Arts
Susan Hill
Teblog
Techdirt
Technology Liberation Front
The Adam Smith Institute Blog
The Agitator
The AntRant
The Becker-Posner Blog
The Belgravia Dispatch
The Belmont Club
The Big Blog Company
The Big Picture
the blog of dave cole
The Corridor of Uncertainty (a Cricket blog)
The Croydonian
The Daily Ablution
The Devil's Advocate
The Devil's Kitchen
The Dissident Frogman
The Distributed Republic
The Early Days of a Better Nation
The Examined Life
The Filter^
The Fly Bottle
The Freeway to Serfdom
The Future of Music
The Futurist
The Happiness Project
The Jarndyce Blog
The London Fog
The Long Tail
The Lumber Room
The Online Photographer
The Only Winning Move
The Policeman's Blog
The Road to Surfdom
The Sharpener
The Speculist
The Surfer
The Wedding Photography Blog
The Welfare State We're In
things magazine
TigerHawk
Tim Blair
Tim Harford
Tim Worstall
tomgpalmer.com
tompeters!
Transterrestrial Musings
UK Commentators - Laban Tall's Blog
UK Libertarian Party
Unqualified Offerings
Violins and Starships
Virginia Postrel
Vodkapundit
WebUrbanist
we make money not art
What Do I Know?
What's Up With That?
Where the grass is greener
White Sun of the Desert
Why Evolution Is True
Your Freedom and Ours


Websites


Mainstream Media

BBC
Guardian
Economist
Independent
MSNBC
Telegraph
The Sun
This is London
Times


Syndicate

RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
Atom
Feedburner
Podcasts


Categories

Advertising
Africa
Anglosphere
Architecture
Art
Asia
Atheism
Australasia
Billion Monkeys
Bits from books
Bloggers and blogging
Books
Brian Micklethwait podcasts
Brians
Bridges
Business
Career counselling
Cartoons
Cats and kittens
China
Civil liberties
Classical music
Comedy
Comments
Computer graphics
Cranes
Crime
Current events
Democracy
Design
Digital photographers
Economics
Education
Emmanuel Todd
Environment
Europe
Expression Engine
Family
Food and drink
France
Friends
Globalisation
Healthcare
History
How the mind works
India
Intellectual property
Japan
Kevin Dowd
Language
Latin America
Law
Libertarianism
Links
Literature
London
Media and journalism
Middle East and Islam
Movies
Music
My blog ruins
My photographs
Open Source
Opera
Painting
Photography
Podcasting
Poetry
Politics
Pop music
Propaganda
Quote unquote
Radio
Religion
Roof clutter
Russia
Science
Science fiction
Sculpture
Signs and notices
Social Media
Society
Software
South America
Space
Sport
Technology
Television
The internet
The Micklethwait Clock
Theatre
This and that
This blog
Transport
Travel
USA
Video
War


Tuesday January 09 2007

I have just had supper with Patrick Crozier and we fixed to do a podcast, in about a month’s time, concerning the First World War.

Towards the end of our evening together, I read out to Patrick the following remarkable passage from one of my favourite books about the causes of war, called, not unsurprisingly, The Causes of War (1973), by the Australian historian Geoffrey Blainey.  Here is what Blainey says (on pp. 209-211 of my 1977 Macmillan paperback edition), about the remarkable Ivan Bloch:

imageThe belief that future wars would be short became a dogma, but it was not completely ascendant. The most withering attack on the dogma was made by, of all people, a banker who lived in the Russian-ruled city of Warsaw.  When Ivan S. Bloch issued in 1897 and 1898 a six-volumed work on war, his voice at first seemed like a frog in a backwater, croaking at the hoot of a passing steamer.  Here was a businessman, telling strategists what to expect.  He suggested that the next major war in Europe would be a long and murderous siege. He envisaged huge unwieldy armies spread along an enormous front and firing with such speed and accuracy that the survivors had to find shelter in trenches.  ‘It will be a great war of entrenchments,’ he said.  ‘The spade will be as indispensable to a soldier as his rifle.  The first thing every man will have to do, if he cares for his life at all, will be to dig a hole in the ground.’ The gap between the two entrenched armies would be so pierced by bullets that no army could hope to storm the enemy’s trenches.  In the words of a French captain he quoted, the front line would be a ‘belt of a thousand paces swept by a crossfire of shells which no living being can pass.’ Neither side would win that monstrous battle.  While the stalemate continued in the trenches, the civilian population would suffer.  Food would become scarce, prices would rise, morale in the cities would quake.  Peace would eventually come, Bloch predicted, through famine and socialist or anarchist upheavals, leaving no nation with victory.

As a scholar of warfare, Ivan Bloch was a genius.  His must have been one of the most remarkable predictions ever made in the field of human behaviour.  So many events of the Great War – the muddy trenches of Flanders and Galicia, the millions of casualties, the socialist revolutions in Russia, the overthrow of the Russian and Austrian and German monarchies, the scarce victories on the battlefield - were consistent with his predictions.  Above all he predicted a calamitous and long war: that he should have designated a war lasting at least two years as ‘a long war’ was a sign of the prevailing faith that future wars would last only a few months.

In making these predictions Bloch culled his evidence from the same recent wars which had persuaded others to see the short war as inevitable. Whereas others had plucked from the Franco-Prussian war the simple lesson that modern wars were decisive and short, Bloch observed more the revolution which broke out during the indecisive siege of Paris in 1870-1.  Whereas others simply marvelled at the swiftness of the Russian victory over the Turks in 1877, Bloch observed how the hasty Turkish entrenchment at Plevna, near the Danube, had thwarted the Russian invaders for several months.  But there were sharper differences between Bloch and most other analysts of war.  He did not believe that past wars were a reliable guide to a future war between major European powers.  A major war in Europe, he believed, would probably involve Russia and France on the one side and Germany, Austria and Italy on the other.  As each alliance had about five million fighting men and as their armaments were similar and as their frontiers were heavily fortified and as military techniques now favoured the defenders, neither alliance would have sufficient strength to break through the opposing defences.  ‘The war of the future, whatever may be said, will be a struggle for fortified positions, and for that reason it must be prolonged.’ Bloch also believed that another set of influences would ultimately intervene and terminate the war.  Those influences were economic.  Famine and inflation would set in more quickly and devastatingly than in previous wars, for the economy of Europe had changed. The economic changes would be most effective, he argued, in a general war, for nations would be unable to borrow gold and food because of the lack of lenders.  In the Europe of mass armies, he argued, ‘you cannot feed your people and wage a great war’.

The other example that was there for all to see was the 1864-5 Virginia campaign, where Lee was able to drag out a completely hopeless losing position for an extra year by digging holes in the ground. Casualty rates at Spotsylvania (look up “Bloody Angle") were not unlike single day losses at the Somme.

I defy any half-informed modern reader to read about it and not think “oh my god, this is the Western Front come fifty years early”. European generals completely ignored it, I assume because whatever colonial amateurs like Lee and Grant did couldn’t possibly have any relevance to them in their professional brilliance.

Posted by Alan Little on 09 January 2007

The Boer War took a little longer than the British intended at the start, too.

But yes, I agree with Alan. I think the American Civil War was the real first war of the new era.

Posted by Michael Jennings on 09 January 2007

Lee was amazing. He was the last brilliant “Napoleonic” style general, winning lots of battles in the early years of the war by out-manoeuvring his enemy. That stopped working at Gettysburg, where it became apparent that, given modern rifles, trying to charge a well-prepared enemy across open ground just got you massacred.

Learning from that, Lee then invented trench warfare and used it to hold off an overwhelmingly superior enemy for almost another two years.

On the wrong side, but a genius.

Posted by Alan Little on 09 January 2007

Amen to all that.  I just thought that it was particularly interesting to note that there was at least one European who, apparently, foresaw WW1 on the basis, apparently, of purely European events.

Posted by Brian Micklethwait on 09 January 2007

The other huge American thing that too many Europeans didn’t seem to get was that if Europe fought too fiercely against itself, it would forfeit its position of global supremacy, far more quickly than would have happened otherwise.  Both sides in WW1 seemed to take it for granted that the prize for winning was world leadership.  (In the British case continued world leadership.) Wrong.

Posted by Brian Micklethwait on 09 January 2007

Trench warfare was independently invented (and overlooked elsewhere) multiple times in the mid- and late- 19th Century.
It’s interesting that New Zealand based it’s requirements for war planning in the 1910s on the experience of loss rates in the Russo-Jap war - and got it about right.

Posted by Errol on 10 January 2007

Hey Bri ,

This is Simon Lau ex Libertarian UK , friend of Dave Carr & Tom Burroughs . Maybe you remember me ?

Why not a forum ? instead of this blog BS ?

Posted by Simon Lau on 14 January 2007

This is just “Survivor bias” unless Mr Bloch can be shown to have made other successful unconventional predictions. If enough people write books about future War (and that was a big literary subject then), at least a few will get it right by pure chance.

On top of that, it was not the American Civil War which inaugurated “Modern” warfare, but WWI. It is clearly explained in “Supplying War” by Martin van Cleveld, that it was not until WWI that the nature of the logistic needs of armies changed.

Posted by Frederick Davies on 26 February 2009

Frederick Davies (thanks for the comment!)

Yes, but he did get it right, didn’t he?  And he didn’t do this by “pure chance”.  He did it by observing those Turks and their trenches.

As for “modern”, this just an argument about what the word means.  If you mean trenches, wire and very high casualties over a long period, then the US Civil War was modern.  If you mean something more modern than the US Civil War, e.g. involving logistics, then it wasn’t.  Although I would say the the Civil War was also logistically pretty modern.  Certain it was very industrial.

Also, why, if you make one successful prediction, does that not count, unless you make others also?

If you are arguing that Bloch said lots of stuff, most of it tosh, that would be an argument for retrospective selection, but you lumped in everyone else.

Posted by Brian Micklethwait on 26 February 2009

Warburg was a German banker and industrialist, head of M.M. Warburg & Co. To the Kaiser he said, “Germany will become stronger with every year of peace. Waiting can bring us only advantage.” Warburg was forced out of the next business he built. Had he remained on its board, according to new Nazi laws, it would be a Jewish business, and destroyed.

Rathenau was a German industrialist and electrical-engineer, head of the General Electricity Co. He could see, he said, “no reason for an international war.” Rathenau was assassinated in 1922, shot five times by the Freikorps with a submachine gun.

Ballin was a German shipping magnate and inventor of the cruise liner, head of the Hamburg-America Line. To the Chancellor he said, “I have spent my entire life building up something which has been of immense value to the German Reich, and then you come along with a couple of others and destroy it all.” Ballin’s employees numbered 25,554. He lost almost half to the war. Killed himself at its end.

And Stinnes, German banker and industrialist, established the Union Mining Company in 1914 in Doncaster, to bring German technology to British coalfields, and bring the two countries together.

Businessmen, in other words, knew how bad it would be. Rothschild predicted a “hideous struggle” and “European conflagration,” that “the calamity would be greater than anything ever seen or known before.”

It was the poets and playwrights who got the First World War wrong.

Posted by Charles on 28 February 2009
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.