Brian Micklethwait's Blog

In which I continue to seek part time employment as the ruler of the world.


Recent Comments

Monthly Archives

Most recent entries


Advanced Search

Other Blogs I write for

Brian Micklethwait's Education Blog

CNE Competition
CNE Intellectual Property
Transport Blog


2 Blowhards
6000 Miles from Civilisation
A Decent Muesli
Adventures in Capitalism
Alan Little
Albion's Seedling
Alex Ross: The Rest Is Noise
Alex Singleton
Another Food Blog
Antoine Clarke
Antoine Clarke's Election Watch
Armed and Dangerous
Art Of The State Blog
Biased BBC
Bishop Hill
Bloggers Blog
Blognor Regis
Blowing Smoke
Boatang & Demetriou
Boing Boing
Boris Johnson
Brazen Careerist
Bryan Appleyard
Burning Our Money
Cafe Hayek
Charlie's Diary
Chase me ladies, I'm in the cavalry
Chicago Boyz
China Law Blog
Cicero's Songs
City Comforts
Civilian Gun Self-Defense Blog
Clay Shirky
Climate Resistance
Climate Skeptic
Coffee & Complexity
Coffee House
Communities Dominate Brands
Confused of Calcutta
Conservative Party Reptile
Contra Niche
Contrary Brin
Counting Cats in Zanzibar
Скрипучая беседка
Dave Barry
Davids Medienkritik
David Thompson
Deleted by tomorrow
diamond geezer
Dizzy Thinks
Don't Hold Your Breath
Douglas Carswell Blog
Dr Robert Lefever
Dr. Weevil
Englands Freedome, Souldiers Rights
English Cut
English Russia
EU Referendum
Ezra Levant
Everything I Say is Right
Fat Man on a Keyboard
Ferraris for all
Flickr blog
Freeborn John
Freedom and Whisky
From The Barrel of a Gun
Fugitive Ink
Future Perfect
Gaping Void
Gates of Vienna
Global Warming Politics
Greg Mankiw's Blog
Guido Fawkes' blog
Here Comes Everybody
Hit & Run
House of Dumb
Iain Dale's Diary
Idiot Toys
India Uncut
Jackie Danicki
James Delingpole
James Fallows
Jeffrey Archer's Official Blog
Jessica Duchen's classical music blog
Jihad Watch
Joanne Jacobs
Johan Norberg
John Redwood
Jonathan's Photoblog
Kristine Lowe
Laissez Faire Books
Last of the Few
Lessig Blog
Libertarian Alliance: Blog
Liberty Alone
Liberty Dad - a World Without Dictators
Lib on the United Kingdom
Little Man, What Now?
listen missy
Loic Le Meur Blog
L'Ombre de l'Olivier
London Daily Photo
Mad Housewife
Mangan's Miscellany
Marginal Revolution
Mark Wadsworth
Media Influencer
Melanie Phillips
Metamagician and the Hellfire Club
Michael Jennings
Michael J. Totten's Middle East Journal
Mick Hartley
More Than Mind Games
mr eugenides
Mutualist Blog: Free Market Anti-Capitalism
My Boyfriend Is A Twat
My Other Stuff
Natalie Solent
Nation of Shopkeepers
Never Trust a Hippy
NO2ID NewsBlog
Non Diet Weight Loss
Nurses for Reform blog
Obnoxio The Clown
Oddity Central
Oliver Kamm
On an Overgrown Path
One Man & His Blog
Owlthoughts of a peripatetic pedant
Oxford Libertarian Society /blog
Patri's Peripatetic Peregrinations
Picking Losers
Pigeon Blog
Police Inspector Blog
Power Line
Private Sector Development blog
Publius Pundit
Rachel Lucas
Remember I'm the Bloody Architect
Rob's Blog
Setting The World To Rights
Shane Greer
Shanghaiist The Violin Blog
Sinclair's Musings
Slipped Disc
Sky Watching My World
Social Affairs Unit
Squander Two Blog
Stephen Fry
Stuff White People Like
Stumbling and Mumbling
Style Bubble
Sunset Gun
Survival Arts
Susan Hill
Technology Liberation Front
The Adam Smith Institute Blog
The Agitator
The AntRant
The Becker-Posner Blog
The Belgravia Dispatch
The Belmont Club
The Big Blog Company
The Big Picture
the blog of dave cole
The Corridor of Uncertainty (a Cricket blog)
The Croydonian
The Daily Ablution
The Devil's Advocate
The Devil's Kitchen
The Dissident Frogman
The Distributed Republic
The Early Days of a Better Nation
The Examined Life
The Filter^
The Fly Bottle
The Freeway to Serfdom
The Future of Music
The Futurist
The Happiness Project
The Jarndyce Blog
The London Fog
The Long Tail
The Lumber Room
The Online Photographer
The Only Winning Move
The Policeman's Blog
The Road to Surfdom
The Sharpener
The Speculist
The Surfer
The Wedding Photography Blog
The Welfare State We're In
things magazine
Tim Blair
Tim Harford
Tim Worstall
Transterrestrial Musings
UK Commentators - Laban Tall's Blog
UK Libertarian Party
Unqualified Offerings
Violins and Starships
Virginia Postrel
we make money not art
What Do I Know?
What's Up With That?
Where the grass is greener
White Sun of the Desert
Why Evolution Is True
Your Freedom and Ours


Mainstream Media

The Sun
This is London


RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0


Billion Monkeys
Bits from books
Bloggers and blogging
Brian Micklethwait podcasts
Career counselling
Cats and kittens
Civil liberties
Classical music
Computer graphics
Current events
Digital photographers
Emmanuel Todd
Expression Engine
Food and drink
Getting old
How the mind works
Intellectual property
Kevin Dowd
Latin America
Media and journalism
Middle East and Islam
My blog ruins
My photographs
Open Source
Other creatures
Pop music
Quote unquote
Roof clutter
Science fiction
Signs and notices
Social Media
South America
The internet
The Micklethwait Clock
This and that
This blog

Saturday January 06 2007

A few weeks back I wrote about my prejudice against the Lib Dems, and then how, in response to prodding from Bishop Hill, they had been slightly modified by meeting a quite sensible sounding Lib Dem on 18 Doughty Street.  As I commented:

The gist of it was, I liked the guy, and he convinced me that the Lib Dems may indeed be moving towards a more principle classical liberalism than was the case in former years.

Certainly enough to make me want to read some more Lib Dem blogs, and see what more I can find on this front.

But now hear this, from Nick M, commenting at Samizdata:

And then there are the Mingers . . .

That’s the Lib Dems, whose leader is Menzies Campbell, with Menzies pronounced “Ming-es”, or “Ming” for short.

. . . who have elevated lack of principle to the status of a principle. I see the stuff they shove through the door here in Manchester and the stuff they shove through my mother’s door in Gateshead and you’d think it came from diametrically opposite parties. In prosperous, white, quasi-rural/suburban/commuter-belt (high-density but cows in the fields - at least until set-aside) West Gateshead the lib-dems play a tune close to classical liberalism/orthodox (Scandi-style) social democracy. In multi-cultural South Manchester they sound more like a front organisation for RESPECT.

Which is exactly what my original prejudice consisted of.  They seem to me like a combination of the duplicitous and the deluded.  Deluded for imagining, insofar as they do, that in one another’s contradictory and chaotic company they will ever be able to accomplish anything.  I can quite believe that the semi-classical liberal chap whom I encountered is sincere in his semi-classical-liberalism.  What I cannot see is him getting anywhere within the Lib Dems, or the Lib Dems themselves getting anywhere, what with them all being so diverse.  They will be a sack of cats for the foreseeable future, even if each cat is sincerely trying to win all the other cats over.  People will vote for them as a protest, but not as a real party with pretensions to forming a real government.

I find myself agreeing with a wince of pain, Brian.  If you’ve read any of my political pieces on LMWN you might note I am the least rightwing of us, but even I am having trouble with the party.

A party who are highly likely to play a role in government after the next election should be debating policy, and ironing out the fudges.  Instead the last year has been a total disaster.

In my life I have voted Lib Dem almost every time i’ve put pen to ballott paper, but this is not classical liberalism… This is stupidity.

Posted by Edwin Hesselthwite on 08 January 2007

Well, I’m a LibDem who would describe himself as a Libertarian (I also seem to be becoming more libertarian recently- I’m even thinking of subscribing to the LA).

I agree there are some horrendous ‘wets’. There are those who think Thatcher embodied economic liberalism and the end of the world will come if we adopt economic liberal policies. Then there’s the social democrats and even worse ‘democratic socialists’ (I do not believe such a thing can exist).

In my conversations with younger LibDems, we seem to be gaining more classically liberal members. There may even be more of us claiming Cobden as a great liberal rather than Lloyd George (who leaves a nasty taste in my mouth).

I remember one person at Liberal Drinks (come along to the Westminster one sometime, it’d be fun :D) lamenting the party’s lack of sound liberal economics and wishing for a social and economically liberal party which truly represents individual freedom.

All political parties are coalitions. I think the LibDems are the best bet for liberalism or libertarianism. They will never be a libertarian party, but as the Tories in the late 70s and 80s were influenced, I think the LibDems can be influenced.

Posted by Tristan Mills on 09 January 2007

I can’t see the stuff that Nick M posted, but I don’t defend it. Not sure why the Lib Dems deserve your particular ire though: Labour elevate hypocracy to the cabinet, while the Tories too seem set on foisting an unprincipled con-trick on the rest of us. I fear that your righeous indignation is simply about politics.

Meanwhile, as you will have seen there is actually a large and growing group of Libertarian minded Lib Dems, and frankly our policy debates are a damn sight more open and honest thaan I have ever seen or heard of from the Tories.

Happy to catch up over that beer, and we can talk further!

Posted by Cicero on 10 January 2007

In we all pile, fists flailing!

I think your suggestion that the Liberal Democrats are somehow more diverse and less disciplined or harmonious than the other parties is ludicrous, as is the belief (which I infer) that the Tories somehow embody (at least economic) liberalism.

All parties are coalitions - John Major described his Government as “a coalition of one”, and Gordon Tullock’s theory of logrolling demonstrates that all politics is compromise (he might also have something to say about your suggestion that only Lib Dems are interested primarily in re-election!).

Labour is torn between New Labour and old socialists, the Conservatives between Thatcherites and new-Butskellites, and the Lib Dems have their Social Democratic and their Liberal wings. I cannot believe that you can claim with a straight face that David Cameron’s acceptance of Labour’s tax-and-spend rate or newfound fondness for the prattlings of Polly Toynbee are consistent with the work of Lord’s Tebbit and Howe.

In fact, which party is now closer to a libertarian ideal? Which is the party that believes in open borders for economic migrants? Which would devolve power to local authorities? Which is the most likely to remove the last vestiges of legal discrimination against homosexuals? Which mooted reconsidering prohibition of cannabis for consenting adults? Which has just announced a raft of income tax cuts? Which is closest to land value taxation, beloved of classical economists? I could go on (you might think I already have ;o)

You are right that the Lib Dems need to be more careful to ensure that their message is more consistent. The easiest way of achieving that without a command-and-control style central office (such as the one that sacked Howard Flyte for going off message) is a strong philosophical basis. I hope that that philosophy will be liberalism in its most classic form.

If you want to discuss this further, perhaps we can have a chat over some of John Blundell’s free wine.

Posted by Tom Papworth on 10 January 2007

All parties are coalitions, but some more than others.

I stand by my prejudice about the Lib Dems being more coalition and less coherence than the other two.  If all we knew about someone was that he was Labour, or Conservative, or Lib Dem, and nothing else, we all make better guesses about what the Conservative or the Labourite thinks than the Lib Dem, and that includes if a Lib Dem is doing the guessing.  Of course we’d often be wrong about the Conservatives and Labourites, and perhaps more wrong in recent years, but Conservative and Labour opinions do have a vague pattern to them.  We’d only randomly be right about the Lib Dems.

What do I base this on? Well, a lot of talking and a lot of listening, in the flesh and on the telly and in the newspapers, and now the blogs.  Is there any actual survery evidence on this?  Maybe.  My prejudice, of course, is that it would support me, and not Tom Papworth.

As for those libertarian noises emerging from the Lib Dems, that’s entirely consistent with the above.  They echo everyone’s opinions, including mine.  That’s why they arouse my “particular ire”, when I’m in the mood to be irate about politicians that is, which is not always.

I just have the strong sense that similar arguments to this one are happening all over the political spectrum, on diametrically opposed blogs and chat rooms to this one, all about how the Lib Dems are the “best bet” for . . . whatever it is, regardless of what it is.  Which party is closer to the [fill in the blank] ideal?  Always: the Lib Dems, but only in the sense that there’ll always be a Lib Dem making those noises.  There’ll be a Lib Dem making any noise you care to imagine.

Nick M’s original Samizdata comment confirms this prejudice, which is why I copied and pasted it.  Is he wrong?  Was he imagining it?  Maybe, but I don’t think so.

Posted by Brian Micklethwait on 10 January 2007

Well, you admit it’s a prejudice, which is a start!

I maintain that it isn’t so easy to predict who stands where based on party. In mid-2003, were you - unencumbered with prior knowledge – to have met Labour Party MPs Anne Clewyd and George Galloway, you would be forgiven for having found their positions somewhat diverse. Both New Labour and Cameron’s Conservatives bear little resemblance to their forebears. One might argue that the Liberal Democrats are neither the party of Gladstone nor of Jenkins, but that only proves that all parties are unpredictable.

I have met Tory libertarians, imperialists and isolationists. US Republicans have neo-cons, paleo-cons and religio-cons. Democrats include hawks, doves, free-traders and isolationists. New Labour is devoid of any recognisable ideology.

Perhaps some real survey evidence would be useful; I’m sure there are research companies capable of carrying out the necessary quantitative and qualitative analysis, if only somebody has the cash with which to finance such a project. I suspect - regrettably - that the desire to be elected would be the strongest force in all politicians.

In the end, just as Hayek dedicated The Road to Serfdom “to the socialists in all parties”, perhaps you should welcome the libertarians in all parties, no matter how much they differ from their colleagues. It is through them that a libertarian consensus will arise.

Posted by Tom Papworth on 10 January 2007
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.